According to those that believe, God is the great superlative in every category. He is all-knowing, all-loving, all-powerful, and he is everywhere and everywhen. But based on what the Bible and your neighborhood church teach, these can’t all be true.
God created humanity, according to the Bible, but man is a completely flawed creature or so the churches would have you believe. Did God create a flawed being on purpose or was it the best he could do, or didn’t he realize the flaws existed? If he didn’t know, he isn’t omniscient. If this was the best he could do, then he isn’t omnipotent. If he did it on purpose, he isn’t omnibenevolent ; creating a flawed being doomed us to much pain and suffering .
Some would argue that it was a loving gesture to create humanity with so many imperfections because only through suffering do we learn life’s lessons and finally come to appreciate what God has to offer. I could possible buy that if the suffering were not so extremely different from person to person and if it eventually ended in a positive manner for everyone; however, this is not the case. This supposedly all-loving god will banish you to an eternity of torture in a flaming Hell simply for not believing. If even a mere mortal such as me finds that scenario totally reprehensible and insufficient in compassion, then how could this all-loving god find this an acceptable result. Clearly he is not all-loving.
And what about being everywhere and everywhen? Think about that for a moment. If he is omnipresent, then he is right there with you through every moment of your life. He is there when you are born and when you die. He is there when you have sex or take a shower. He is there when the drunk gets in his car and drives away. He is there when moments later the same drunk plows through a sidewalk full of school children. He is there for every beating by a bully, every rape of a child, every plane crash, every terrorist attack, and every murder. He is there when every horrendous act occurs, but does nothing to stop them. Nothing. This is all-loving? Of course, you will hear the argument about not interfering with our free will, but then these same people will talk of miracles – times when he clearly interferes. You can’t have it both ways. He either interferes or he doesn’t and an omnipotent god should be able to figure out a way to step in and help without affecting our free will; if he can’t he is not omnipotent. If he choices not to, he is not all-loving.
If he is not all-loving, all-knowing, and omnipotent, then he is not a god.
No comments:
Post a Comment